기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

[강의계획] 정치경제의 이해

2015년 2학기

정치경제의 이해


본 강의에서는 분배적 정의의 다양한 관점들을 이해하고, 정치적 의사결정 및 경제적 자원배분과 관련하여 각 관점의 시사점과 정책적 제도적 함의에 대하여 살펴볼 것이다. 이를 통하여 시장경제와 지구화의 역사적 전개에 대하여 이해하고 이를 분배적 정의의 관점에서 평가할 것이다. 특히, 최근 대두되고 있는 지구온난화의 문제와 국제사회의 대응에 대하여 분배적 정의의 제 관점이 시사하는 바를 살펴보고 이를 통하여 공정한 기후협약안을 찾아볼 것이다.

[교재]

재정학 (제4판)

이만우, 주병기 공저, 2015년, 율곡출판사.

[참고자료]

Distributive Justicve


  • John Rawls, 1971,  A Theory of Justice, Harvard U Press.
  • Robert Nozick, 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
  • Robert Nozick, 1973, Distributive justice, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 3, 45-126.
  • John Locke, Two Treaties on Government.
  • John Harsanyi, 1953, Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking, Journal of Political Economy, 61, 434-435.
  • John Harsanyi, 1955, Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility, Journal of Political Economy, 63, 309-321.
  • Hausman, D.M., M.S. McPherson, 2006, Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy, 2nd edition, Cambridge U Press.



    Welfare Economics and Fair Allocation

    • Yarri, M., M. Bar-Hillel, 1984, On dividing justly, Social Choice and Welfare, 1, 1-24.
    • Feldman, A., A. Kirman, 1974, Fairness and envy, American Economic Review, 64, 995-1005.
    • Varian, H. 1974, Efficiency, equity and envy, Journal of Economic Theory, 9, 63-91.
    • Philippe Mongin, 2001, The impartial observer theorem of social ethics, Economics and Philosophy, 17, 147-179.
    • Edi Karni, John A. Weymark, An informationally parsimonious impartial observer theorem, Social Choice and Welfare, 15, 321-332.
    • Hal R. Varian, 1985, Dworkin on equality of resources, Econ and Phil, 1, 110-125.

    Inequality


    • Atkinson, A.B., 1970, On the measurement of inequality, Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244-263.
    • Sen, A.K., On Economic Inequality
    • Sen, A.K., 1974, Informational bases of alternative welfare approaches, Journal of Public Economics, 3, 387-403.
    • Thon, D., 1982, An axiomatization of the Gini coefficient, Mathematical Social Science, 2, 131-143.
    • Cowell, F.A., K. Kuga, 1981, Inequality measurement: An axiomatic approach, European Economic Review, 15, 287-305.
    • Cowell, F.A., 2009, Measuring Inequality.
    • Litchfield, J.A., 1999, Inequality: Methods and tools, World Bank.
    • Piketty, T., 2014, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Belknap Harvard.

    Global Inequality


    • Bourguignon, F., C. Morrisson, 2002, Inequality among world citizens: 1820-1992, American Economic Review, 92, 727-744.
    • Pritchett, L., 1997, Divergence, big time, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 3-17.
    • Milanovic, B., 2011, A short history of global inequality: The past two centuries, Explorations in Economic History, 48, 494-506.
    • Milanovic, B., 2005, Worlds Apart, 2005.
    • Milanovic, B., 2010, The Haves and the Have-Nots.
    • Ortiz, I., M. Cummins, 2011, Global inequality: Beyond the bottom billion, UNICEF.

    Climate Change and Distributive Justice

    • Posner, E.A., D. Weisbach, 2010, Climate Change Justice, Princeton U Press.
    • Singer, P., 2008, One World: The Ethics of Globalization.
    • Neumayer, E., 2000, In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions, Ecological Economics, 33, 185-192.
    • Pierrehumbert, R.T., 2013, Cumulative carbon and just allocation of the global carbon commons, Chicago Journal of International Law, 13, 527-548.


    이 블로그의 인기 게시물

    [강의계획서] 정치경제의 이해

    2016년 2학기 정치경제의 이해 본 강의는 분배정의론의 다양한 관점과 규범경제학, 그리고 정치 및 경제제도에 대한 경제이론적 분석과 규범적 평가에 대하여  다룰 것이다. 이를 바탕으로 시장경제와 불평등, 지구온난화, 난민문제, 세대간 공평성 등의 정치경제적 주제들에 대하여 논의하고 규범경제학적 분석에서 얻어지는 제도적 함의에 대하여 살펴볼 것이다. [교재] 재정학  (제4판) 이만우, 주병기 공저, 2015년, 율곡출판사. [참고자료] Distributive Justicve John S. Mill, Utilitarianism John Rawls, 1971,  A Theory of Justice, Harvard U Press. Robert Nozick, 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. Robert Nozick, 1973, Distributive justice, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 3, 45-126. John Locke, Two Treaties on Government. John Harsanyi, 1953, Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking, Journal of Political Economy, 61, 434-435. John Harsanyi, 1955, Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility, Journal of Political Economy, 63, 309-321. Hausman, D.M., M.S. McPherson, 2006, Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy, 2nd edition, Cambridge U Press. Welfare Economics and Fair Allocation Ya
    자세한 내용 보기

    Advanced Economic Theory: Political Economy, Reading List

    Advanced Economic Theory: Political Economy Reading List 2021 봄학기     평등주의   O'Neill, Martin, 2008, What should egalitarians believe?, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36. Parfit, Derek, 1997, Equality and priority, Ratio, X. Parfit, Derek, 1991, Equality or priority?, University of Kansas. Moreno-Ternero JD, Roemer JE (2004) Impartiality. priority and solidarity in the theory of justice, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No.1477, Yale University Moreno-Ternero JD, Roemer JE (2006) Impartiality, priority and solidarity in the theory of justice. Econometrica 74(5):1419–1427 Moreno-Ternero JD, Roemer JE (2012) A common ground for resource and welfare egalitarianism. Games Econ Behav 75:832–841 Chun, Youngsub, Inkee Jang, Biung-Ghi Ju, 2014, Priority, solidarity and egalitarianism, Social Choice and Welfare, 43, 577-589.   분배정의와 공정배분   Harsanyi, J.C., (1953), Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking, Journal of Political Economy 61, 434-435.   Harsanyi, J
    자세한 내용 보기

    Priority, solidarity and egalitarianism

    Social Choice and Welfare February 2014 ·         Youngsub Chun ,   ·         Inkee Jang ,   ·         Biung-Ghi Ju   Download PDF   (224 KB) View Article Abstract We provide alternative axiomatic characterizations of the extended egalitarian rules (Moreno-Ternero and Roemer, Econometrica 74:1419–1427,   2006 ) in a fixed-population setting of the canonical resource allocation model based on individual capabilities (output functions). Our main axioms are   disability monotonicity   (no reduction in the amount of resources allocated to an agent after she becomes more disabled) and   agreement   (when there is a change in agents’ capabilities or total resources, all agents who remain unchanged should be influenced in the same direction: all unchanged agents get more or all get less or all get the same amount as before). Look   Inside Within this Article 1.       Introduction 2.       Preliminaries 3.       Axioms 4.       Main results 5.       Concluding remarks 6.       References 7.   
    자세한 내용 보기